Digital CurationThis is a featured page


Digital curation


"Digital curation is the curation, preservation, maintenance, and collection and archiving of digital assets",
Wikipedia

[lots of text to go in here eventually]

In this section we'll first look at the rationale for digitisation; secondly, consider the technologies we would use in digitising collections; thirdly, consider how we'd describe and catalogue digital objects using formal languages; and finally review some digital asset management systems.

Why digitise?


One of the best general introductions to digitisation is the Canadian Heritage Information Network (CHIN) tutorial, Capture Your Collections (see references at the bottom of this page). The primary reason, it notes, is to increase accessibility of collections, both for outreach activities and public access (web site, support for e-learning, promotional material) and for display of objects otherwise too fragile for handling ("Digitization enhances preservation and conservation strategies, since once digitization has occurred the handling of fragile originals can be minimized"):

One of the main virtues of digital imaging is its ability to make collections vastly more accessible. Digital technology helps achieve institutional goals, whether highlighting particular aspects of local history or reaching a national or international audience. Collections that were once too remote to be viewed are now accessible; objects that were once too fragile to be handled or exhibited can now be seen by broad audiences. By making it possible to bring together diverse materials or collections from scattered locations for comparison and research, digital technology can be a powerful teaching aid, especially when institutions work together to create a critical mass of complementary material.

There are many further benefits. Among these are:

  • "Digitization also provides an incentive to improve documentation, especially if companion records are to be made public along with the digitized images." Although museums may offer exhibition catalogues and books to complement the text accompanying exhibits, they are not themselves a fully integrated part of the exhibition in the way that they may become so when part of the digital collection. And because digital copy may be updated more regularly and immediately than print copy, the documentation is more likely to be up to date
  • while the physical constraints of exhibition space in real-world museums entail that many objects will rarely, if ever, be publicly displayed in galleries, there is no such space constraint on digital display. Although in practice the time and cost overheads of digitisation may mean that many objects may still never be exhibited, in principle they can be.
  • "Because digital technology makes it possible to search large numbers of records, to modify and manipulate images and text, and to bring together disparate materials in new ways, it can be considered a flexible tool useful throughout the museum. The ease of performing the tasks mentioned above is also an incentive for increased cooperation with other institutions."
  • adding metadata and documentation to objects may lead to the discovery of new relationships both between objects internal to the collection and between these and digitised objects held in other collections. In any case, liberated from the constraining topography of the physical museum, a digital collection presents the opportunity of organising objects in new and potentially knowledge-creating ways

Set against such advantages, there are two issues to consider:

  • the cost in time, software, and expertise in digitising objects, in managing the digital collection, and in ensuring the preservation of digital assets
  • because technologies evolve and change over time, the necessity of planning for migration to new formats and technologies as needed. (An interesting case study is the rescue of the BBC Doomsday project, published in 1986 on laser disks played on hardware no longer available.)

Once decided to digitise, a number of questions need to be considered. The excellent Council on Library and Information Resources report, Selecting Research Collections for Digitization (1998) by Dan Hazen, Jeffrey Horrell, and Jan Merrill-Oldham, examines in some detail most of the important issues, including:

  • Does the intellectual quality of the source material warrant the level of access made possible by digitizing?
  • Will digitization enhance the intellectual value of the material?
  • Will electronic access to a body of information add significantly to its potential to enlighten, or are the original books, manuscripts, photographs, or paintings sufficient to the task?
  • Is current access to the proposed materials so difficult that digitization will create a new audience?
  • How do scholars use the existing source materials? What approach to digitization will facilitate their work?
  • Will digitization increase the utility of the source materials? Will it enable new kinds of teaching or research? Do scholars agree that the proposed product will be useful?

I'd strongly urge you to read and digest this report in its entirety before proceeding further.

Identifiers


Once an object--whether it be text document (e.g. a book), image, audio or video clip, or other--has been digitised there must be some way of uniquely identifying it. The idea of identifiers is not new: the International Standard Book Number (ISBN) identifier for books, for example, dates back to an original Standard Book Number (SBN) created in the UK in 1966. See Andy Powell's article 'Unique Identifiers in a Digital World' and Clifford Lynch's 'Identifiers and their Role in Networked Information Applications' for further background to identifiers.

Various unique naming conventions have been devised in recent years in response to the need to be able to uniquely identify objects. ISSN (International Standard Serial Number), for identifying periodical publications such as magazines and journals, was adopted in 1975; more recent standards include ISTC (International Standard Text Code), ISMN (International Standard Music Number) for the identification of printed music publications, ISWC (International Standard Musical Work Code), and SICI (Serial Item and Contribution Identifier). Among the more important recent (1997) standards is the Digital Object Identifier (DOI) specifically for identifying digital objects at any level of granularity. The following extract from the DOI web site both identifies the rationale for DOI and also provides some useful context:

Unique identifiers are essential for the management of information in any digital environment. Identifiers assigned in one context may be encountered, and may be re-used, in another place (or time) without consulting the assigner, who cannot guarantee that his assumptions will be known to someone else. To enable such interoperability requires the design of identifiers to enable their use in services outside the direct control of the issuing assigner. The necessity of allowing interoperability adds the requirement of persistence to an identifier: it implies interoperability with the future. Further, since the services outside the direct control of the issuing assigner are by definition arbitrary, interoperability implies the requirement of extensibility. Hence the DOI System is designed as a generic framework applicable to any digital object, providing a structured, extensible means of identification, description and resolution. The entity assigned a DOI® name can be a representation of any logical entity.

To better understand the importance of DOI--and to get a better grasp of identifiers in general--it will be helpful to characterise identifiers according to the following six parameters:

  1. an identifier may be transparent (derivable) or opaque (not inherently meaningful or interpretable
  2. the entity referred to by an identifier may be a work (an abstraction, such as "Beethoven's 5th Symphony" or "Charles Dickens' Hard Times", not tied to any particular physical medium) or a manifestation (a physical exemplar such as a specific recording or a specific edition)
  3. an identifier may or may not be actionable (clicking on it will take you directly to the thing named)
  4. if actionable, it may or may not be persistent (designed to withstand changes in the online location of the object identified)
  5. who drives or regulates the identifier registration process (e.g. the author, publisher, library community)
  6. whether descriptive metadata (see below) is registered in association with the identifier

ISBNs, for example, are opaque (humans can't work out what book is being referred to simply by looking at its number), non-actionable (you can't click an ISBN), publisher-driven, and not associated with a metadata registry. In contrast, descriptive metadata--minimally a title, author, registration date and identity of registrant--will be associated with an ISTC identifier.

DOI identifiers are opaque (variable-length alphanumeric strings such as doi:10.1000/182 which just happens to be the DOI Handbook, or 10.1162/desi.2006.22.3.29 for 'Collective Storytelling and Social Creativity in the Virtual Museum: A Case Study' by Elisa Giaccardi), persistent (unlike URLs, which are pointers to locations subject to change and thus broken links over time, a DOI will always refer to a unique object), actionable (you can click the link to access the object), and have associated metadata.

Metadata


Metadata is generally informally understood to mean "data about data", and more specifically these days to refer to standardised, structured information that machines can interpret and use. To avoid being sidetracked into pointless philosophical discussions regarding what counts as 'data' and what as 'information', and how the two may be related, we'll understand data and metadata to be quite simply whatever people speak about and use as such.

When, in editing the 'Info' form for a MP3 in iTunes, for example, you enter information in the relevant fields for 'Name', 'Artist', 'Album', 'Year', 'Genre', and so on, what you are actually doing is entering descriptive metadata. And the fields are not arbitrary: they are 'frames' in the ID3v2 specification. Descriptive metadata is, of course, metadata that characterises the content itself; a digital object may also have other types of metadata associated with it--technical metadata (information such as file type, encoding, bit rate, and sample rate), rights metadata (dealing with intellectual property rights), preservation metadata (information needed to archive and preserve a resource), among others.

As there is a great deal of published and freely accessible documentation on metadata, my own notes here will be sparse. Good introductions to metadata are:


Please read one or ideally more of the above before continuing.

Dublin Core metadataFor library cataloguing and bibliographic documentation (embracing text, images, moving images, sound recordings, software, 3D, and maps) the de facto standard format has long been MARC (MAchine-Readable Cataloging) and its variants, developed from the late 1960s. Creating "cataloging records" for libraries, rather than designed strictly as a metadata standard as we now understand it, it is nonetheless interoperable with other metadata standards

Probably one of the most well known and widely used metadata schemes for digital resources is the Dublin Core Metadata Element Set, conceived originally as a simple set of elements for describing web documents but now also used for other resources. The current set of 15 elements includes: Title, Creator, Subject, Description, Publisher, Type, Format, Identifier, Language, and Rights. The example below, showing the Dublin Core metadata in the document head (also shown in the screenshot, right, of the Dublin Core Viewer plugin for Firefox), is from EdNA (Education Network Australia):

<meta name="DC.Title" content="Metadata"/>
<meta name="DC.Identifier" scheme="URI" content="http://www.edna.edu.au/edna/go/resources/metadata"/>
<meta name="DC.Creator" content="edna Education Network Australia"/>
<meta name="DC.Type" scheme="DCMIType" content="Text"/>
<meta name="DC.Publisher" content="education.au"/>
<meta name="DC.Publisher" content="http://educationau.edu.au"/>
<meta name="DC.Description" content="Education Network Australia (edna) is a resource database and collaborative network for educators and learning communities"/>
<meta name="DC.Format" scheme="IMT" content="text/html"/>
<meta name="DC.Language" scheme="RFC3066" content="en"/>
<meta name="DC.Coverage" scheme="edna-spatial" content="Australia"/>
<meta name="DC.Rights" content="http://www.edna.edu.au/edna/go/about/policies/terms/"/>


University of Louisville Digital CollectionThere are many good online examples of museums, galleries and archives using the the Dublin Core metadata element set (or some derivative of it) for their exhibitions. Some 50 or so user sites are listed on the Dublin Core web site. One not listed there that I particularly like for its clarity of display, and which I'd suggest you look at, is the University of Louisville Digital Collections (screenshot of home page, left).

You should also make time to browse some subset of the following:


Finally, the Getty Standards and Digital Resource Management Program has a useful 'Metadata Standards Crosswalks' in the form of a detailed comparative grid of metadata standards.

The following scenario is an indicative example of 'metadata in action' when used to describe oral histories (the example is taken from the NISO publication, Understanding Metadata):

An oral historian makes tape-recordings of interviews with members of a particular ethnic group. Interviewees sign a paper release form giving intellectual property rights to the historian. Most interviewees grant permission to disseminate the interviews in print and electronically, but several restrict publication and dissemination until 25 years after death.

Information about each interview is kept in a database: Interviewer, Interviewee, Date, Place, etc. Each interview follows a questionnaire format. The questionnaire exists as a text file. The tapes, release forms, database, and text file are donated to a library that has a special collection focusing on the particular ethnic group.

The tapes are digitized. Since each interview runs over several tapes, technicians record structural metadata to keep component parts of each interview together. Technicians record administrative metadata such as file names, location of each interview in the files, equipment used, the methods of digitizing and assuring quality and completeness, file formats, etc. Different segments of this metadata allow the audio files to be automatically tracked, accessed, stored, refreshed, and migrated.

An archivist expands the database to include the persistent identifier of each interview, thereby linking the audio file to the descriptive metadata. The names of the data elements are revised to match Dublin Core terminology, including qualifiers used specifically for audio materials. Information on rights and permissions is entered.

An archivist creates an EAD finding aid for the audio collection using the database as the core. Portions of the questionnaire text file are incorporated as a rich source of subject keywords. A MARC record is derived from the EAD finding aid and added to OCLC and RLIN.

A webpage is created where researchers can access the finding aid, search the database, and listen to the audio files. Interviews coded as restricted are invisible to the search program until the date when they become open to the public. Administrative, structural, and descriptive metadata is created for the webpage to hold all the pieces together, allow them to be managed, and allow them to be accessed.

The library participates in a metadata harvesting protocol to provide extracts of local metadata in a common format to a service provider so that information about the collection is automatically included in a number of relevant tools such as catalogs and portals.

The webpage is linked to the library’s website dedicated to resources about the ethnic group, where it is available to researchers in context with archival and visual materials, digitized secondary sources, etc. Administrative, structural, and descriptive metadata at the website level has also been created.


In order that structured metadata be machine readable it is characteristically captured and expressed in XML format @@@

@@@

SPECTRUM (Standard ProcEdures for CollecTions Recording Used in Museums)

@@@

CRM (CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model, ISO 21127:2006)


@@@

represents an 'ontology' for cultural heritage information i.e. it describes in a formal language the explicit and implicit concepts and relations relevant to the documentation of cultural heritage. The primary role of the CIDOC CRM is to serve as a basis for mediation of cultural heritage information and thereby provide the semantic 'glue' needed to transform today's disparate, localised information sources into a coherent and valuable global resource.

... the CRM looks very similar to an object-oriented database schema. However, as a formal ontology, it represents a higher level of abstraction: a simplified representation of how experts and laymen perceive reality, specifically the reality of cultural heritage, in terms of categories (classes) and relationships (properties). It is a common ground of understanding rather than an arbitrary convention and, as such, it is extensible and unlimited.

The current Official Version (4.2.4 at the time of writing) of the CIDOC CRM can be found on the CIDOC web site at ICS-FORTH.

To gain a better understanding of ontologies, metadata, and specifically CRM, I also recommend browsing some of publications listed on the CIDOC References page.

Collections management and access / digital asset management systems


Museums, galleries, archives, and cultural and heritage institutions in general have 'assets'--their collections--and these need to be catalogued in some way or another, generally in a database of some kind. What kind of database, and how collections should be catalogued, will--or at least should--be determined by how one intends to use the database, what types of information will be stored.

Collection management systems (CMS) have been around since the early 1990s. Although the terms 'collection management system' and 'digital asset management system' are sometimes used interchangeably, strictly speaking the former more narrowly focuses on the cataloguing of the physical artefacts in a collection.

Beyond the physical collection of artefacts, the museum will be likely to have 'digital assets'. What are 'digital assets'? what is a 'digital asset management system' (DAMS)? or sometimes, more specifically, 'digital content management' (DCM)? or, often specifically with respect to the entertainment industry, 'media asset management' (MAM)? How does DAM or DCM differ from 'document management'? think iTunes! come to that, think YouTube ... Flickr ... VodPod ... Whether created through the digitisation of analogue materials (such as text, still images, video or audio) or created as digital objects and existing uniquely in digital form, digital assets (notes Seamus Ross) "have the very unique characteristic of being both product and asset". The following definition is distilled from Albert van Niekerk:

Digital Asset: A digital asset is any form of content and/or media that have been formatted into a binary source which include the right to use it. A digital file without the right to use it is not an asset. Digital assets are categorised in three major groups which may be defined as textual content, images and multimedia (after van Niekerk, A.J. 2006. 'A methodological approach to modern digital asset management: An empirical study', Proceedings of the International Academy for Case Studies, Volume 13, Number 1, p.53ff. Allied Academies, New Orleans Congress, Spring, 2006).

And from Wikipedia:

Digital Asset Management consists of tasks and decisions surrounding ingesting, annotating, cataloguing, storage and retrieval of digital assets, such as digital photographs, animations, videos and music. Digital asset management systems are computer software and/or hardware systems that aid in the process of digital asset management.

What advantages does state-of-the-art DAM have over conventional databases? how does a 'digital asset management system' differ from a 'document management system'? Beyond just management of media resources, many DAMSs support metadata, tagging, remixing, media sharing, collaboration. In Digicult Thematic Issue 2 ('Digital Asset Management Systems for the Cultural and Scientific Heritage Sector'), a DAMS is characterised as:

a set of coordinated technologies that allow the quick and efficient storage, retrieval, and reuse of digital files that are essential to an organisation. It provides the rules and processes needed to acquire, store, index, secure, search, export, transform and make accessible these assets (or derivatives of them) as well as their descriptive information. In particular, what merits highlighting is the fact that a DAMS can increase enormously the value of digital assets by managing the metadata about the assets. It is the metadata that make them useful (and re-useful) to the organisation, by indicating, for example:Who created it? When? In what format? Are there other versions of it? What rights do we have to this asset? For what purposes has it been used before in the organisation or by partners? These metadata are essential to heritage organisations whose functions are to collect, archive, preserve, and provide access to their collections for scholarly and educational communities.

In his expository paper in that same volume, Seamus Ross offers the useful short definition:

Digital Asset Management involves the creation of a digital archive to hold resources, the provision of an infrastructure that will help to keep the entities from becoming obsolete, and a range of discovery and browsing tools to enable potential users to be able to identify, locate and retrieve the digital entities held by the DAMS.

and crucially:

When associated with suitable policies, procedures and licensing arrangements, DAMS provide institutions with a way to facilitate the exploitation of their digital assets without depleting the value of the asset itself. [My italics]

Gathered from a number of sources, I've listed below (and see also the table in this link for a comparison between the tools and processes associated with document management systems and those of DAMS) most of the key features one might require of a DAMS:

Content acquisition, cataloguing & and management
  • that it provide support for content acquisition both of 'born-digital' entities and of digitised analogue materials (text, still images, audio, video);
  • that it provide tools to handle very large files (multi-GB in video production);
  • that it support cataloguing, management, and storage of digital materials;
  • that it provide mechanisms to apply metadata at varying levels within the asset and to manage metadata associated with the asset;
  • that it support parsing of embedded data such as IPTC/XMP ("Extensible Metadata Platform") and others;
  • that it provides a foundation for the storing, managing and migrating of digital entities across time, providing the basic building blocks for long-term digital preservation systems

End-user experience
  • that it present visually rich search results;
  • that it provide image recognition tools for visual searches ("find images like this");
  • that it support image manipulation/transformation, including on the fly requests like resizing or color conversion;
  • that it support integration with creative applications (authoring tools) to allow seamless access to the repository (e.g. QuarkXPress, Adobe suite of desktop and server applications, video tools like Final Cut Pro, Virage, Telestream, and also CAD, Flash and 3-D applications)
  • that it is a foundation for services to manage the delivery of digital content;

Media management
  • that it allow dis-assembly, linking, and access to compound assets;
  • that it enable one to assemble assets for reuse (video play lists, image sets, PowerPoint presentations).
  • that it allow video transcoding and on-the-fly requests for lower resolution or different encoding (MPEG vs. Real vs. QuickTime vs. Media Player);
  • that it allow text indexing (as with DM), but also video indexing of speech-to-text, speaker ID, face ID, closed captioning and more;

Protecting Intellectual Property and copyright
  • that it allow watermarking of still and moving images;
  • that it support advanced rights management and usage tracking.

Software


CollectiveAccess (formerly OpenCollection)
Open source (GPL licence) collections management and access application, with free download. "OpenCollection is a full-featured collections management and online access application for museums, archives and digital collections. It is designed to handle large, heterogeneous collections that have complex cataloguing requirements and require support for a variety of metadata standards and media formats. Unlike most other collections management applications, OpenCollection is completely web-based. All cataloging, search and administrative functions are accessed using common web-browser software, untying users from specific operating systems and making cataloguing by distributed teams and online access to collections information simple, efficient and inexpensive".
See examples of implementations of OpenCollection by clicking the Who's using it link in the left sidebar; and try out a demo by clicking the Demonstration link.
Installation and configuration: moderately easy, though requires hand editing of setup.php and global.conf text files.
» http://www.collectiveaccess.org

Fedora
"Fedora Commons is a non-profit organization providing sustainable technologies to create, manage, publish, share and preserve digital content as a basis for intellectual, organizational, scientific and cultural heritage by bringing two communities together. Communities of practice that include scholars, artists, educators, Web innovators, publishers, scientists, librarians, archivists, publishers, records managers, museum curators or anyone who presents, accesses, or preserves digital content."
» http://www.fedora-commons.org

Concerto
"Assets within Concerto are managed by means of collections and exhibitions and can be assigned both structured and unstructured metadata. Concerto supports Dublin Core and Visual Resource Association (VRA) metadata standards, as well as any user-defined metadata schema. Concerto also provides a user interface for adding and editing tags (i.e. unstructured metadata) and generates tag clouds for tags within and across collections and users." Great software--worth looking at some of the example collections.
» https://concerto.middlebury.edu
» https://segue.middlebury.edu/index.php?&action=site&site=concerto

DSpace
"DSpace captures your data in any format – in text, video, audio, and data. It distributes it over the web. It indexes your work, so users can search and retrieve your items. It preserves your digital work over the long term. DSpace provides a way to manage your research materials and publications in a professionally maintained repository to give them greater visibility and accessibility over time."
Installation and configuration: quite challenging and not for the faint-hearted. Requires Java JDK 5, Apache Maven, Apache Ant, Jakarta Tomcat, PostgreSQL database, and Perl.
» http://www.dspace.org

Montala ResourceSpace
"ResourceSpace is a web-based, open source digital asset management system which has been designed to give your content creators easy and fast access to print and web ready assets." See the ResourceSpace wiki for the full list of features.
» http://www.montala.net/resourcespace.php
» http://rswiki.montala.net/index.php/Main_Page

ccHost
"ccHost is an open source (GPL licensed) project that provides web-based infrastructure to support collaboration, sharing, and storage of multi-media using the Creative Commons licenses and metadata. It is the codebase used by ccMixter and other sites. Besides its focus on sharing content, ccHost differentiates itself from other multi-media hosting programs by emphasizing the reuse (a.k.a. remixing) of content between artists, not only between artists on any given installation of ccHost, but between all installations across the web and any web site that implements the Creative Commons Sample Pool API, including non-ccHost sites such as the freesound project."
» http://wiki.creativecommons.org/CcHost

Omeka
"Omeka is a web platform for publishing collections and exhibitions online. Designed for cultural institutions, enthusiasts, and educators, Omeka is easy to install and modify and facilitates community-building around collections and exhibits. ... Omeka will include basic Web 2.0 features such as an RSS feed, blog, and a tag cloud. Other planned plugins include a mapping function, and ways to collect and display stories and photos from web visitors who are demanding a different type of online interaction shaped by Web 2.0. Omeka offers organizations and individuals the opportunity to share in the creation of content. We encourage users to develop other Web 2.0 applications that fit into Omeka’s plugin architecture, and omeka.org will host a directory of all plugins created by the community. Interactive and participatory systems, like Omeka, build regular interaction with a base of online visitors and encourage democratic participation in the shaping of our culture." An excellent cross-platform digital curation and web publishing application; extensive and detailed text and video tutorials make this easy to install and manage.
Installation and configuration: Not too difficult, but note requirements: Linux operating system, Apache server with mod_rewrite enabled, MySQL 5.0 or greater, PHP 5.2.x or greater (with mysqli and exif extensions installed), and ImageMagick for resizing images
» http://omeka.org

StreetPrint
"revolutionary new software for powering digital collections ... free software for creating your own digital collections. Our goal is to make formerly inaccessible and ephemeral texts and artifacts available to the widest possible audience, fulfilling the promise of the Internet and bringing information 'back to the streets'." Have a look at some of their example sites.
Installation and configuration: very easy.
»http://streetprint.org

Adlib Museum Lite

The free version of Adlib Museum. "Adlib Museum is a software application for managing collections and information in museums. ... Adlib Museum offers comprehensive functionality and interfaces for professional collections management. Standard features include integrated display of text and images, and interfaces to external applications such as Word, Excel and Web pages. ... In addition to cataloguing and inventory control, Adlib Museum supports the Spectrum procedures for collections management including: object entry, acquisition, insurance, valuation, location and movement control, loans in and out, condition and conservation etc. Exhibition management is also included."
» http://www.adlibsoft.com

Scholar's Box
"The UC Berkeley Interactive University's Scholar's Box project seeks to translate commonplace teacher practices into the digital realm so that teachers can more easily integrate into teaching the digital cultural objects available from museums and libraries. We seek to do this not only for individual teachers but for groups of teachers and/or content and collection experts working together to create curriculum resources. Early versions of the IU's "Scholar's Box" tool already demonstrate the promise for faculty, students, and the public to create, manipulate, annotate, and share personal collections of digital cultural objects gathered from multiple digital repositories. The IU is building both a Scholar's Box tool as well as an abstraction framework that defines functionality and APIs for other possible implementations."» http://iu.berkeley.edu/IU/SB

Archaeoblender
» http://www.archaeoblender.com

Scriblio (formerly WPopac)

The Digital Asset Management Database (works with Filemaker Pro 8.5 & higher)
"Building on previous successful work in the areas of standards and online collections access, the new MOAC software tool, the Digital Asset Management Database (DAMD), has been developed as both a utilitarian tool and as a test case for exploring more general issues of content sharing and community tool development.
This tool has two primary functions that can be used together or separately: it provides basic digital asset management for simple to complex media objects and it easily transforms collections information into an extensible variety of standards-based XML formats, such as METS and OAI, to allow even small organizations without technical staff to share their collections broadly and participate in building a national network of culture."
» http://bampfa.berkeley.edu/moac/
» http://www.mcn.edu/resources/index.asp?subkey=1980

ECHO ToolCenter
ECHO (Exploring and Collecting History Online) is "a first step into the field of digital history: since 2001 it has been a laboratory for experimentation in this new field, and it fosters communication and dialog among historians, scientists, engineers, doctors, and technologists. In addition to facilitating access to digital resources on the history of science, technology, and industry, ECHO has promoted the creation of digital history with tools like Zotero and the construction of Digital Memory Bank technology (as in preserving the memories of Hurricane Katrina). We also help scholars and institutions with their own digital history projects through workshops and consultancies." The ToolCenter is a directory of dozens of resources--including Scholar's Box, Greenstone, and Collex--for digital history and digital media management.
» http://echo.gmu.edu/toolcenter-wiki/index.php?title=Category:Tools

Examples
:

The Antonio Jobim online collection at the Instituto Antonio Carlos Jobim, Brazil
Uses MIT's DSpace digital asset management and search platform
» http://www.jobim.org


Bibliography and references


1. Web resources


Digicult Technology Watch Report No.1, New Technologies for the Cultural and Scientific Heritage Sector, 2003. Read 'Digital Asset Management Systems' (= pp.41-62)
» http://www.digicult.info/downloads/html/1049756401/1049756401.html

Digicult Thematic Issue 2: 'Digital Asset Management Systems for the Cultural and Scientific Heritage Sector'
» http://www.digicult.info/downloads/html/1039519224/1039519224.html

'Digital Asset Management' (= Chapter XIII of The NINCH Guide to Good Practice in the Digital Representation and Management of Cultural Heritage Materials)
» http://www.nyu.edu/its/humanities/ninchguide/XIII/

Digital Asset Management: A Glossary of Terms
» http://www.daydream.co.uk/DAM_glossary.asp

Digital Curation Centre and the DCC Digital Curation Manual
» http://www.dcc.ac.uk
» http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Curation_Centre
» http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resource/curation-manual

International Journal of Digital Curation
» http://www.ijdc.net

Lee, C.A. & Tibbo, H.R. (2007). 'Digital Curation and Trusted Repositories: Steps Toward Success'. Journal of Digital Information, Vol 8, No 2.
A very readable introductory paper by Christopher A. Lee and Helen R. Tibbo, School of Information and Library Science, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
» http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/article/view/229/183

Digitization101
"The place for staying up-to-date on issues, topics, lessons learned and events surrounding the creation, management, marketing and preservation of digital assets."
» http://hurstassociates.blogspot.com

Digital Curation Blog
"Blog inspired by the Digital Curation Centre to discuss issues relating to the curation and long term preservation of digital science and research data."
» http://digitalcuration.blogspot.com

Digital Preservation Coalition
"The aim of the Digital Preservation Coalition is to secure the preservation of digital resources in the UK and to work with others internationally to secure our global digital memory and knowledge base."
» http://www.dpconline.org

The Canadian Heritage Information Network (CHIN), Capture Your Collections - digitization tutorial
A detailed and very straightforward tutorial on digitization for novices.
» http://www.chin.gc.ca/English/Digital_Content/capture_collection.html

Technical Advisory Service for Images (TASI), 'An Introduction to Digital Preservation'
» http://www.tasi.ac.uk/advice/delivering/digpres.html

The Library of Congress Digital Preservation Program
» http://www.digitalpreservation.gov

JISC Digitisation Programme
"The JISC Digitisation programme is founded upon the need to build significant e-resources from some of the UK’s greatest collections in a wide variety of formats – sound, images, journals, moving pictures, newspapers and much else. Using the latest technology available, the projects provide the education community with the opportunity to engage with a critical mass of previously difficult or impossible to access resources for the first time."
» http://www.jisc.ac.uk/whatwedo/programmes/digitisation

CASPAR (Cultural, Artistic and Scientific knowledge for Preservation, Access and Retrieval)
"How can digitally encoded information still be understood and used in the future when the software, systems, and everyday knowledge will have changed? This is the challenge of CASPAR. ... CASPAR will research, implement, and disseminate innovative solutions for digital preservation based on the OAIS reference model (ISO:14721:2002). The website provides official project documentation and material relevant to digital preservation and related disciplines. It also serves as an information and communication tool for the CASPAR Preservation User Community."
» http://www.casparpreserves.eu

2. Books, conference papers, journal papers


Arthur, M (2005). 'Intro to Digital Asset Management: Just what is a DAM?'
» http://cmswatch.com/Feature/124-DAM-vs.-DM

Baca, M. (ed). (2008). Introduction to Metadata: Pathways to Digital Information. Getty Research Institute. 2nd edition. ISBN 978-0-89236-896-9

Brand, A., Daly, F. & Meyers, B. (2003). Metadata Demystified: A guide for publishers. Hanover, PA: The Sheridan Press / NISO Press. ISBN: 1-880124599.

Foulonneau, M. & Riley, J. (2008). Metadata for Digital Resources: Implementation, Systems Design and Interoperability. Oxford: Chandos Publishing. ISBN: 1843343010. [Amazon]

McHugh, A. (2005). DCC Digital Curation Manual Instalment on Open Source for Digital Curation. Technical Report ISSN 1747-1524.

Patel, M., White, M., Mourkoussis, N., Walczak, K., Wojciechowski, R., & Chmielewski, J. (2005). 'Metadata Requirements for Digital Museum. Environments'. International Journal on Digital Libraries Volume 5, Issue 3 (May 2005). Pp. 179-192. ISSN:1432-5012. [Web]

Smiraglia, R. (ed.) (2005). Metadata: A Cataloguer's Primer. Binghampton, NY: Haworth Press Inc. ISBN: 0789028018. [Amazon]



cshutchison
cshutchison
Latest page update: made by cshutchison , Mar 31 2009, 3:06 PM EDT (about this update About This Update cshutchison Edited by cshutchison

37 words added

view changes

- complete history)
Keyword tags: None
More Info: links to this page
There are no threads for this page.  Be the first to start a new thread.